[Draft Constitution: FEC policy decision, March 20, 1946]

20 March 1946

The Honorable James F. Byrnes
Secretary of State
Washington, D. C.

My dear Mr. Secretary:

Under the provisions of the agreement of Foreign Ministers at Moscow, establishing the Far Eastern Commission, it was agreed that one of the functions of the Commission should be to "formulate the policies, principles and standards in conformity with which the fulfillment by Japan of its obligations under the terms of surrender may be accomplished."

It was further agreed that when such decisions were made by the Far Eastern Commission, "The United States Government shall prepare directives in accordance with the policy decisions of the Commission and shall transmit them to the Supreme Commander through the appropriate United States Government agency."

At a meeting of the full Far Eastern Commission held at its headquarters, 2516 Massachusetts Avenue, Northwest, Washington, D.C. on 20 March 1946 the enclosed policy decision was unanimously agreed to.

As Secretary General of the Far Eastern Commission, I have been instructed to forward this decision to you on behalf of the Commission in order that the appropriate directives may be prepared and transmitted to the Supreme Commander in accordance with the terms of the Moscow Agreement.

Respectfully yours,
 
Nelson T. Johnson
Secretary General

Enclosure

ENCLOSURE

The Commission has received from the United States Government the text of a draft constitution which appears to have been drawn up in compliance with an Imperial rescript, the text of which has also been supplied by the United States Government, along with the Supreme Commander's comments on that text.

The opening sentences of this draft indicate to the Commission that it will be presented to the first session of the Japanese Diet which will be chosen at the forthcoming general elections. The Commission therefore assumes that this and possibly other texts will be debated in the Diet and that amendments may be offered and perhaps other proposals introduced.

The Commission, therefore, desires that the Supreme Commander keep it informed of the progress and development of this and other drafts that may be considered by the Diet.

For mindful of its responsibilities under its Terms of Reference for the formulation of policy in regard to the implementation of the surrender terms, and of the important bearing which this or any other proposed changes in the constitutional structure of Japan may have upon the decisions in carrying out that responsibility, the Commission desires that the Supreme Commander for the Allies make clear to the Japanese Government that the Far Eastern Commission must be given an opportunity to pass upon the final draft of the Constitution to determine whether it is consistent with the Potsdam Declaration and any other controlling document before it is finally approved by the Diet and becomes legally valid.

The Commission believes that in this way hasty action by the Japanese Diet will be prevented and time given for all elements inside and outside the Diet to consider this very important question and bring to that consideration all available thought produced by the freely expressed will of the Japanese people.

In this connection the Commission notes the encouragement given to the Japanese people in the Supreme Commander's announcement that this draft of a proposed constitution has his personal approval. It is somewhat apprehensive that this approval may be misunderstood by the Japanese public and taken to mean that this particular draft has the approval of the Powers represented on this Commission.

As such is not necessarily the case and as the Commission does not want to take any action in regard to this or any other draft constitution that might prejudice Japanese public opinion for or against any proposal of this nature, it considers that the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers should in some appropriate manner make it known to the Japanese people that while this draft of a proposed Constitution is a document of obvious merit and is available now for consideration and study, the fact that it is a draft prepared by the Government does not preclude favorable consideration of other proposals or drafts which may be submitted to the Diet for study and comparison.

The Commission requests that the United States Government inform the Supreme Commander of its views as expressed above, and since the constitutional issue is one that is likely to influence the votes of the electors, it do so with a minimum of delay.

FAR EASTERN COMMISSION
2516 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE, N. W.
WASHINGTON 8, D. C.

The attached is certified to be the official text of a document unanimously adopted at the fourth meeting of the Far Eastern Commission, held at 2516 Massachusetts Avenue, Northwest, Washington, D. C. on 20 March 1946.

Nelson Trusler Johnson
Nelson T. Johnson
Secretary General

Washington, D. C.
21 March 1946


以下は上記文書の日本語訳です(一部、翻訳されていません)。「帝国憲法改正諸案及び関係文書. 3:連合国側関係文書」(憲資・総第十一号)憲法調査会事務局(1957年)から転載しました。

委員会は、アメリカ合衆国政府から、憲法草案の正文を、その正文についての最高司令官の注解とともに受けとつた。この草案は、同様にアメリカ合衆国政府によつて正文が委員会に支給されている勅語に従つて起草されたように思われる。

この草案の冒頭の文章は、その草案が、来る総選挙において選出される日本の議会の最初の会期に提出されることを委員会に示している。従つて、委員会は、本正文およびときとしてはその他の正文が議会で討議され、かつ修正が提案され、恐らくはその他の提議が出されるものと考える。

従つて、委員会は、最高司令官が議会によつて審議される本草案およびその他の草案の推移と発展とを委員会に絶えず知らせることを希望する。

委員会が、付託条項にもとづき、降伏条件の履行に関する政策の公式の決定をする責任を負うこと、および、日本の憲法構造につきここに提議された変革或いはその他の提議される変革が、その責任を遂行するための諸決定に重大な関係を有することからみて、委員会は、憲法の最終草案が最終的に議会によつて承認され、法律上効力を発生する以前に、それがポツダム宣言およびその他の管理のための文書に適合しているかどうかを決定するために、極東委員会にその最終草案を審査する機会が与えられねばならないことを、連合国最高司令官が日本政府に明らかにすることを希望する。

委員会は、このような方法をとれば、日本の議会が性急な行動をとることを防止し、議会の内外をとわずすべての分子が、このきわめて重要な問題を検討するため、かつ日本国民の自由に表明された意見から生れるあらゆる意見を考慮にいれることができるために、充分な時間が与えられる、と信ずる。

この点に関して、本委員会は、ここに提案された憲法の草案は最高司令官の個人としての同意をえているという同司令官の声明で、日本国民に激励が与えられていることに注目する。この同意が日本国民によつて誤解されて、この特定の草案は、本委員会に代表を送つている列強の同意をえていることを意味するようにとられる懸念がいくらか存在する。

かかることは必らずしも真実ではなく、また本委員会は、この憲法草案またはその他の憲法草案に関して、この種のいかなる提案に対しても日本の国民の世論に賛成ないし反対の偏見を抱かせるおそれのあるいかなる行動もとることを欲しないのであるから、連合国最高司令官が、何らかの適当な方法で、ここに提案された憲法草案は明白な長所をそなえた文書であり、今や審議と検討に供されているものではあるが、それが政府によつて準備された草案であるという事実は、他の提案ないし草案が検討と比較のために議会に上程されて、それが有利な審議をうけることを妨げるものではないということを、日本国民に知らせるべきであると、委員会は考える。

本委員会は、以上に述べられた委員会の見解を、アメリカ合衆国政府が最高司令官に通告すること、しかも憲法問題は恐らく選挙人の投票に影響を与えると思われるものであるから、できる限り遅滞なくその通告を行うことを要求する。
Copyright©2003-2004 National Diet Library All Rights Reserved.